Titlebook: Critique of the Empiricist Explanation of Morality; Is there a Natural E C. W. Maris Book 1981 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 19

intuition

按時(shí)間順序

機(jī)械

擔(dān)憂(yōu)

A topography of the empiricist theories of law,ousness forms the supersensible higher part of the human personality, which links man to a rational, absolute world, not bound by the contingencies of time and space. This higher world sets a standard by which the world of the senses — the world of natural phenomena — can be measured. It is the inte

Extricate

The empiricist theories of David Hume and Adam Smith,cribe as moral: Hume in . (1739–40) and . (1739–40), and Smith in . (1759). Hume gave to his book . the subtitle ‘An attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects’. In this context, ‘experimental’ means ‘based on experience and observation’. By ‘moral subjects’, Hume

acrophobia

Comte and positivism,o Comte, science must confine itself to ‘positive facts’. Philosophical positivism is a theory of knowledge which does not differ very greatly from Hume’s empiricism. Hume’s study of causality, says Comte, formed

micronized

Herbert Spencer and evolutionism, expectation that, from the point of view of morality, the process of evolution will lead to the natural dominance of altruism. The rest of Spencer’s evolutionary theory also strongly resembles Comte’s doctrine. It also contains a very comprehensive synthesis of all the sciences. His main work is th

不公開(kāi)

細(xì)查

RUPT