Titlebook: Christian Perspectives on Transhumanism and the Church; Chips in the Brain, Steve Donaldson,Ron Cole-Turner Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if ap

conquer

罵人有污點

Even Cyborgs Cast a Shadow: Christian Resources and Responsibilities in Response to Transhumanismnist movement and the Christian church’s response. First, the essay demonstrates that the liberal, humanistic accounts of transhumanism have their shadow side because they reflect an imperfect representation of the self and political community, and it offers a corrective drawn from the work of H. Ri

破布

Rivalry, Control, and Transhumanist Desireealthy. This view is problematized by René Girard’s mimetic theory of human desire and Jean-Michel Oughourlian’s theological account of the origin of desire. This perspective suggests that the desires shaping transhumanist projects arise socially through imitation. Furthermore, consuming desires for

宇宙你

Epilogue: The Church—Bigger Bangs Are ComingChristians have struggled to determine the roles they are expected to play in the divine–human narrative. This tension is palpable through the refrains of prophetic and apocalyptic literature, calling for a change of heart and action on the one hand but professing on the other that, without divine i

思想靈活

irreparable

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-50552-0. In this regard, there is a natural conversation between transhumanism and Christianity. To begin a substantive conversation with transhumanism, a re-conception of “technology” is needed, one that expands our understanding and can provide criteria for evaluating its function in our lives. This chap

ARCH

ectropion

Olivier Sirost,Charly Machemehln and technological innovations need not be dehumanizing if we give appropriate attention to our inmost being, or consciousness. This chapter considers aspects of Drummond’s theological anthropology and argues that his basic spiritual discipline—which influenced various twentieth-century nonviolent

瑣碎

Rotator-Cuff

The Premature Demise of the Soul,n the “image” and “l(fā)ikeness” of God. It considers a version of that teaching that is seemingly as permissive as could be about “transhumanist technologies,” and concludes that even that version places significant limits on the pursuit and adoption of such technologies. Those limits are far more rest