Titlebook: Animal Rights Education; Kai Horsthemke Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 animal rights.animal minds.critical

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:09:24

Nikola ?obelji?,Radmila Stojanovl?ifferentiated understanding “biophilia” would pertain only to animate nature, whereas “ecophilia” could be taken to cover both animate and inanimate nature. They share with sustainability a holistic orientation, and therefore have little to say about individual natural existents, like animals.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:16:52

Agricultural Versus Industrial Development,en to treat animals with kindness and respect would encourage them to treat humanity in the same way, once they grew older and stronger. The problem with appeals to kindness and love for animals is that how one . about what one does is logically distinct from the moral assessment of . one does.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:10:10

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:42:58

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:44:03

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:12:05

2634-6672 animal rights education.Discusses animal minds and interests.This book explores how the ethical treatment and status of other-than-human animals influence pedagogy, teaching, and learning in general, aiming to fill what has been a gap in the philosophy of education. It examines key trends in this re

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:02:58

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:16:13

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-26 02:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved