Titlebook: Virtue Epistemology Naturalized; Bridges Between Virt Abrol Fairweather Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Amplia

DEMUR

Metacognition and Intellectual Virtueemic abilities and moral virtues, and epistemic evaluation and evaluations of success through ability in ordinary contexts. Less has been accomplished on the question of what is characteristic of . virtues or abilities, and more specifically, what distinguishes intellectual virtues from other reliab

Heart-Rate

Success, Minimal Agency and Epistemic Virtue more minimal the sense of agency, the less plausible the postulation of a reflective requirement for knowledge; and the more enriched the sense of agency, the less epistemically relevant the characterization of ‘virtue.’ Although this may not be a surprising tradeoff, I present new consequences of

TRUST

Towards a Eudaimonistic Virtue Epistemologyrlying vision and knowledge that, according to current neuroscience, remain non-conscious can’t be considered virtuous mechanisms even if they are highly reliable. Hence, I argue, virtue epistemology cannot count these obvious forms of knowledge as true forms of knowledge. Virtue epistemology thus i

placebo-effect

珠寶

健忘癥

Curiosity, Belief and Acquaintanceo what curiosity is (I am inclined to think that curiosity based knowledge has more value than what might be called “accidental” knowledge. If so this should provide good reason for virtue epistemologists to address philosophical questions on curiosity). After all the classical “definition” equates

英寸

男學(xué)院

沙發(fā)

貧困