Titlebook: Varieties of Virtue Ethics; David Carr,James Arthur,Kristján Kristjánsson Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 v

輕快來事

聚集

Varieties of Virtue Ethicsndamental anthropology, understanding differently the relation between the virtues and emotions, having divergent understandings of the broad conceptual structure of morality, some being aretaically monistic while others are pluralistic. Others offer monisms that make some dimension of the moral lif

幻影

Which Variety of Virtue Ethics?y with neo-Aristotelian accounts (still the most popular) but also target-centered, exemplarist, agent-based and sentimentalist accounts, as well as accounts based on Kant, utilitarianism and other theories. This blossoming in a former desert is to be heartily welcomed, but it also produces a new is

為敵

Against Idealization in Virtue Ethicsnever realized. I shall argue against the use of ideals (.) in virtue ethics on both theoretical and practical grounds. The widespread, implicit assumption that ideals are necessary bits of theoretical machinery is not only false, but counterproductive. The widespread use of ideals as goals is not o

Ergots

Asseverate

DAMP

pacifist

cajole

conifer

Human Practice and God’s Making-Good in Aquinas’ Virtue Ethicsirtues” – God-given strengths – that fit our complex psyche for the journey into God’s happiness. Their context is Charity, friendship with God. For some scholars, Aquinas does not rate acquired virtues highly; or the infused virtues exclude or absorb them. I argue that Aquinas values both kinds. In