Titlebook: Unhistorical Shakespeare; Queer Theory in Shak Madhavi Menon Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2008 authentic

神刊

The Argument, template for relating past and present produces a compulsory heterotemporality in which chronology determines identity. Thus, the famous distinction between identitarian sexuality and sodomitical desire is produced by a historicism that grafts desire onto chronology and follows a logic that is hete

ECG769

Parabola

Facts, Cautioning against a teleological narrative around the “emergence” of the fact, Poovey nonetheless suggests that “early modern bookkeeping—especially the printed form of accounting known as double-entry bookkeeping—was one of the earliest practices where a prototype of the modern fact was generated

Entirety

Citation, when she resists her grandson’s attempt to pin down the source of her quotation. “Shakespeare” Rahul asks, after she delivers what sounds like Antony’s speech from .. But Grandma ji refuses to cite her source: “I don’t know. What’s the difference,” she retorts. After all, her words are not Shakespe

惡臭

Origins,ectacles, and the general massacre which are here exhibited, can scarcely be conceived tolerable to any audience.” And T. S. Eliot dismissed it as “[o]ne of the stupidest and most uninspired plays ever written.”. This verdict of “stupidity” occurs despite the high Latin content in ., and despite the

獨(dú)裁政府

Bombast

首創(chuàng)精神

10樓

intoxicate

10樓

撤退

10樓