找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics; Rodney K. B. Parker Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 41729|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:13:38 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics
編輯Rodney K. B. Parker
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/912/911609/911609.mp4
概述This volume sheds new light on the idealism-realism debate which was at the heart of the early phenomenological movement.Brings together writings by both established and young scholars working on reco
叢書(shū)名稱Contributions to Phenomenology
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics;  Rodney K. B. Parker Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland
描述.This volume aims to contextualize the development and reception of Husserl’s transcendental-phenomenological idealism by placing him in dialogue with his most important interlocutors – his mentors, peers, and students. Husserl’s “turn” to idealism and the ensuing reaction to. Ideas I. resulted in a schism between the early members of the phenomenological movement. The division between the realist and the transcendental phenomenologists is often portrayed as a sharp one, with the realists naively and dogmatically rejecting all of Husserl’s written work after the .Logical Investigations.. However, this understanding of the trajectory of the phenomenological movement ignores the extensive and intricate contours of the idealism-realism debate. In addition to helping us better interpret Husserl’s attempts to defend his idealism, reconsidering the idealism-realism debate elucidates the relationship and differences between Husserl‘s phenomenology and the broader landscape of early 20th century German philosophy, particularly the Munich phenomenologists and the Neo-Kantians. The contributions to this volume reconsider many of the early interpretations and critiques of Husserl, inviting re
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Early Phenomenology; Husserlian Phenomenology; Idealism-realism Debate; Ideal Objects; Object Phenomenol
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62159-9
isbn_softcover978-3-030-62161-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-62159-9Series ISSN 0923-9545 Series E-ISSN 2215-1915
issn_series 0923-9545
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics年度引用




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:47:01 | 只看該作者
0923-9545 20th century German philosophy, particularly the Munich phenomenologists and the Neo-Kantians. The contributions to this volume reconsider many of the early interpretations and critiques of Husserl, inviting re978-3-030-62161-2978-3-030-62159-9Series ISSN 0923-9545 Series E-ISSN 2215-1915
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:40:13 | 只看該作者
The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:12:53 | 只看該作者
Rodney K. B. ParkerThis volume sheds new light on the idealism-realism debate which was at the heart of the early phenomenological movement.Brings together writings by both established and young scholars working on reco
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:13:10 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:13:17 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:59:03 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:48:43 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:48:11 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:27:49 | 只看該作者
Book 2021 his most important interlocutors – his mentors, peers, and students. Husserl’s “turn” to idealism and the ensuing reaction to. Ideas I. resulted in a schism between the early members of the phenomenological movement. The division between the realist and the transcendental phenomenologists is often
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 05:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
丰宁| 洛扎县| 顺义区| 从化市| 德格县| 宜章县| 镇原县| 夏河县| 甘洛县| 长兴县| 东莞市| 南乐县| 杂多县| 信阳市| 镇沅| 信丰县| 馆陶县| 曲水县| 蛟河市| 府谷县| 阜南县| 临泽县| 海城市| 海门市| 玉门市| 洛浦县| 德州市| 南溪县| 黑河市| 右玉县| 东方市| 东乡族自治县| 巫山县| 纳雍县| 临洮县| 潼关县| 高台县| 蒙自县| 邓州市| 郴州市| 岳阳市|