找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Soul, Mind and Brain from Descartes to Cognitive Science; A Critical History Paolo Pecere Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 不能平庸
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:35:31 | 只看該作者
iousness studies.Connects the work of Descartes, Locke, Kant. .This interdisciplinary book ties the historical work of Descartes to his successors through current research and critical overviews on the neuroscience of consciousness, the brain, and cognition.? This text is the first historical survey
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:43:28 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:25:35 | 只看該作者
Active Matter, Mental Powers and the Limits of Knowledge,gnition developed in the scientific framework of the new physics. In the final section I consider alternative eighteenth century materialist and Newtonian theories of active matter, such as Haller’s theory of irritability and French “vital materialism”.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:03:57 | 只看該作者
,Descartes’ Double Legacy, point out that Descartes left a double legacy: a metaphysical legacy, centered on his theory of the two substances, and a physiological legacy, centered on the mechanistic analysis of perception and voluntary movement. The unpublished . (.) was the source of a rigorously mechanistic approach to men
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:23:20 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:26:54 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:56:40 | 只看該作者
Physiology of Mind and Autonomy of Reason: A Kantian Legacy, considered as an exemplary case of a non-reductive and non-metaphysical view of consciousness, the historical roots of this connection have been rarely considered. My analysis starts from Kant’s investigation of the possibility and limits of the physiology of mind in the essay on Samuel Soemmering’
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:33:30 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:12:10 | 只看該作者
Philosophy of Mind and Neuroscience: Evidence, Hypotheses, Critique,and functionalism formulated in philosophy of mind since the 1950s, pointing out the gap between theories and their future empirical corroboration. Second, I provide a survey of the problem of qualitative consciousness that has been raised by naturalist philosophers of mind between the 1970s and the
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:02:45 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 13:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
新密市| 贞丰县| 阿城市| 渑池县| 堆龙德庆县| 即墨市| 柞水县| 东港市| 宜章县| 兰考县| 隆子县| 白朗县| 锦州市| 大石桥市| 忻城县| 元谋县| 乌兰察布市| 额敏县| 赞皇县| 颍上县| 抚顺市| 日照市| 从化市| 应城市| 靖西县| 叶城县| 苍南县| 黔东| 清水河县| 毕节市| 石首市| 额济纳旗| 三穗县| 陵川县| 洛阳市| 武义县| 潮安县| 宝丰县| 浦东新区| 日土县| 九江县|