找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Similar Practice, Different Rationales; Political Fact-Check Laurens Lauer Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 無法修復
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:24:56 | 只看該作者
Laurens Lauers to be enhanced and that there was a willingness exhibited by individuals to engage in tasks and discussions. It is argued that teaching and learning can be enriched as the technological tools and pedagogical processes are brought together in appropriate ways. By referring to the integration of tec
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:51:30 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:37:34 | 只看該作者
Book 2024pertise, visions, and strategies. This book delves into this fascinating world, exploring how theconcept of fact-checking has proliferated globally. Spotlighting efforts in Argentina, Georgia, Italy, and the U.S., it offers an in-depth understanding of fact-checkers‘ approaches, their alignment with
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:50:45 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:58:10 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:45:40 | 只看該作者
Comparing Fact-Checking Initiatives Around the World,plary selection of the increasingly growing community of fact-checkers in 2016. They are either initial pioneers of the concept or early adopters, whose links highlight how the idea of fact-checking travels, which elements of it are being adopted consistently, ar undergoing adjustment or are novel extensions.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:28:26 | 只看該作者
Fact-Checking Initiatives in Different Political-Media Contexts, context triggers specific logics of political fact-checking by: (a) appealing as an idea to different social groups to varying degrees; and (b) favoring certain rationales regarding their legitimacy in more general terms.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:31:33 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:48:15 | 只看該作者
Introduction,in his time as vice president. Readers of the website, many new ones among them thanks to Cheney, could find the facts about the Halliburton issue and the most critical claims raised during the debate the next day in a long piece titled “Cheney & Edwards Mangle Facts”.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:05:56 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 01:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
藁城市| 永福县| 简阳市| 静宁县| 新民市| 张家界市| 徐汇区| 原平市| 石泉县| 镇赉县| 都江堰市| 嘉禾县| 蒙阴县| 若尔盖县| 格尔木市| 富宁县| 咸宁市| 大足县| 保康县| 竹溪县| 蚌埠市| 汪清县| 宣威市| 蓬溪县| 石泉县| 高尔夫| 东源县| 通江县| 溧水县| 博罗县| 瑞丽市| 安塞县| 潮州市| 盘锦市| 远安县| 郑州市| 石狮市| 麻阳| 武冈市| 密云县| 汉川市|