找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: SCOTUS 2018; Major Decisions and David Klein,Morgan Marietta Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Jefferson
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:54:20 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:23:53 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:09:51 | 只看該作者
The Troubled Confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh,ord and other women’s claims that nominee Brett Kavanaugh was a sexual assailant. Prior to those accusations, Kavanaugh—a former clerk to Justice Kennedy, aide to President George W. Bush, and federal judge on the D.C. Circuit Court—seemed assured of confirmation to the Court. This concluding chapte
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:41:10 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:44:47 | 只看該作者
Book 2019 SCOTUS series describes, explains, and contextualizes the landmark cases of the US Supreme Court in the term ending in 2018, covering issues such as gay rights, religious liberty, public sector unions, coerced speech, digital privacy, voting rights, and the Trump travel ban. Bringing together notab
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:57:19 | 只看該作者
on Gay Rights Versus Religious Liberty,s this core debate, but instead focuses on the actions of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission in disparaging the religious beliefs of the baker. Because the state government was not a neutral arbiter of the competing claims, seven Justices ruled that the government’s actions against the baker could not stand.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:07:10 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:11:43 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:06:36 | 只看該作者
on the Travel Ban,slims, in violation of the First Amendment? The Court’s decision to uphold the travel ban as a reasonable security restriction will increase the power of the presidency, but does not provide a blank check when First Amendment rights are implicated.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:50:46 | 只看該作者
on Internet Taxation,ting a company’s presence in a state even when there is no . presence. In this sense, “the Internet’s prevalence and power have changed the dynamics of the national economy.” The Court corrected the “false constitutional premise” of prior decisions, arguing that the social facts of the Internet—and hence of commerce—have clearly changed.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
锦州市| 称多县| 怀仁县| 沁阳市| 临高县| 大新县| 泸溪县| 兰州市| 德化县| 法库县| 玛曲县| 望奎县| 简阳市| 海城市| 呈贡县| 外汇| 安义县| 高唐县| 鞍山市| 建水县| 塘沽区| 武山县| 大竹县| 洪江市| 神木县| 太湖县| 繁峙县| 琼中| 伽师县| 桂阳县| 通海县| 深圳市| 苗栗市| 临高县| 长治市| 乐业县| 恩平市| 利川市| 册亨县| 藁城市| 霞浦县|