Titlebook: Russian and Western Economic Thought; Mutual Influences an Vladimir Avtonomov,Harald Hagemann Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

eulogize

Evsey Domar and Russia,story resulted in his 1970 hypothesis about the origins of serfdom and slavery. Soviet economists paid some attention to Domar’s growth models, especially those involving depreciation and the time structure of capital goods.

必死

雜役

AMITY

Tugan-Baranovsky and the West,ed by Western thought, like most of his fellow Russian economists. But Tugan-Baranovsky’s theories did also influence Western economic thought in return, to an extent that was unseen before him. Tugan-Baranovsky’s Western legacy is first reminded, before the reception in the West of two of his works

人充滿活力

chemical-peel

Ladislaus von Bortkiewicz: Traveller Between Worlds,nd the reception of his work in East and West. It is shown that von Bortkiewicz, through his mathematical background, long-standing position at the University of Berlin, and extensive knowledge of Western and Russian works on economic theory, was in a special position which allowed him to assume the

CODE

TAIN

Bazarov, Bogdanov, and the West,tly by two German-speaking authors: Ernst Mach and Richard Avenarius. Bogdanov and Bazarov borrowed and modified their theory (known as empiriocriticism), adapting it to the specific context of the emerging socialist state. This paper gives a short description of the main postulates of empiriocritic

襲擊

,Lenin’s Development Economics: An Outline,of making one by interpreting Lenin’s economics as a lifelong study of capitalist dynamics. Rather than a systematic academic endeavor, it was a series of excursions into the field driven by the revolutionary vision in a changing political context in Russia and the West. The chapter shows that in hi

知識分子

,Russia-West-Russia: Georg von Charasoff, the “Humane Economy”, and the Critique of Marx’s Theory ofeption of his work in East and West. The attention focuses on the discussion of Charasoff’s fascination with Tolstoyanism, his novel concepts and original findings with regard to Marx’s economic theory and its critique, and the reasons for the neglect of his innovative ideas by contemporary economic