Titlebook: Romanticism and Linguistic Theory; William Hazlitt, Lan Marcus Tomalin Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim

Vasodilation

Victorian Perspectives,scussed in the context both of his predecessors and of his contemporaries. But what of his successors? Did his advocacy of, say, the ‘familiar’ style and his rejection of the type of ‘verbal’ criticism practiced by John Gibson Lockhart, John Wilson, Francis Jeffrey, William Gifford, and others, exer

秘密會議

Valves

跳脫衣舞的人

瑣碎

http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/831707.jpg

色情

字的誤用

令人作嘔

Philology and Philosophical Grammar, Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, George Berkeley, Jeremy Bentham, to name just a few. However, since Hazlitt’s interest in the interconnections between philology and philosophy was both acute and abiding, his linguistic work is rather more intricate than is generally supposed. For instance, rather t

是他笨

擴音器