找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rights Before Courts; A Study of Constitut Wojciech Sadurski Book 20051st edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2005 Central and Eas

[復制鏈接]
查看: 39320|回復: 47
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:12:16 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Rights Before Courts
副標題A Study of Constitut
編輯Wojciech Sadurski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/831/830355/830355.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Rights Before Courts; A Study of Constitut Wojciech Sadurski Book 20051st edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2005 Central and Eas
描述.Challenging the conventional wisdom that constitutional courts are the best device that democratic systems have for the protection of individual rights, Wojciech Sadurski examines carefully the most recent wave of activist constitutional courts: those that have emerged after the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe. In contrast to most other analysts and scholars he does not take for granted that they are a “force for the good”, but rather subjects them to critical scrutiny against the background of a wide-ranging comparative and theoretical analysis of constitutional judicial review in the modern world. He shows that, in the region of Central and Eastern Europe, their record in protecting constitutional rights has been mixed, and their impact upon the vibrancy of democratic participation and public discourse about controversial issues often negative. Sadurski urges us to reconsider the frequently unthinking enthusiasm for the imposition of judicial limits upon constitutional democracy. In the end, his reflections go to the very heart of the fundamental dilemma of constitutionalism and political theory: how best to find the balance between constitutionalism and democrac
出版日期Book 20051st edition
關鍵詞Central and Eastern Europe; Constitutional Courts; Constitutionalism; Constitutions; Democratic theory; G
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3007-X
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-3007-9
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2005
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Rights Before Courts影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rights Before Courts影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Rights Before Courts網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Rights Before Courts網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Rights Before Courts被引頻次




書目名稱Rights Before Courts被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Rights Before Courts年度引用




書目名稱Rights Before Courts年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Rights Before Courts讀者反饋




書目名稱Rights Before Courts讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:54:22 | 只看該作者
idual rights, Wojciech Sadurski examines carefully the most recent wave of activist constitutional courts: those that have emerged after the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe. In contrast to most other analysts and scholars he does not take for granted that they are a “force for the go
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:01:50 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:33:50 | 只看該作者
The Model of Constitutional Review in Central and Eastern Europe: An Overviewfrom 1985.. Although these were not exactly sham institutions, their position was far from strong enough to allow for the exercise of robust constitutional review. Quite apart from the legal definitions of their competence, the genuine powers of both were inevitably subject to the restrictions stemm
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:02:34 | 只看該作者
The Model of Judicial Review and its Implicationso the basic model are relatively unimportant. They will be dealt with below, in a chapter that will discuss critically the dominant model of constitutional review in postcommunist countries of CEE, in terms of three significant dimensions: the power of constitutional courts to conduct abstract revie
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:59:28 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:38:51 | 只看該作者
Judicial Review and Protection of Constitutional Rightsed on the role of those courts in the protection of individual rights — in particular, those explicitly entrenched in the respective constitutions. It has been accepted, virtually without critical scrutiny, that constitutional courts . have strong powers to monitor the constitutionality of legislati
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:42:45 | 只看該作者
Personal, Civil and Political Rights and Libertiesl courts. Special attention will be paid to those cases in which legislative articulations of rights were set aside, and invalidated, as unconstitutional: this is for the obvious reason that these cases give us the best insight into the role of constitutional courts in shaping the general patterns o
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:59:49 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:03:44 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-24 08:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
黄石市| 张家港市| 麻栗坡县| 吴忠市| 潍坊市| 绩溪县| 成武县| 富宁县| 楚雄市| 安顺市| 广宁县| 义乌市| 高碑店市| 霸州市| 定边县| 分宜县| 土默特右旗| 东安县| 奉化市| 沅陵县| 精河县| 五常市| 古浪县| 延寿县| 湛江市| 清水河县| 晴隆县| 南开区| 绍兴县| 三门峡市| 崇明县| 宁津县| 伊宁县| 庆阳市| 卢湾区| 嵊泗县| 枞阳县| 长子县| 来安县| 郎溪县| 龙海市|