Titlebook: Restless Reason and Other Variations on Kantian Themes; Amihud Gilead Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc

絕食

The Relationship Between the Formal and Transcendental-Metaphysical Logic, the transcendental logic or the other way round? Which logic serves as a model for the other? Some years ago, Nathan Rotenstreich argued for the priority of the formal-transcendental logic, whereas his colleague and student, Zvi A. Bar-On, following Solomon Maimon and others, thought that the prior

感情脆弱

大猩猩

The Problem of Immediate Evidence According to Kant and Hegel, philosophical system. Self or immediate evidence is incompatible with Kant’s idea of the human reason as a systematic whole, all of whose parts are interconnected. In a similar vein, Kant, Spinoza, and Hegel, each in his own way, reject the idea of the Given, insofar as the forms of perceptions can

巨碩

,A Kantian Response to Sellars’s Criticism of the Myth of the Given,yth of the given. The myth argues, inter alia, that we have a direct awareness of perception data, whereas, Sellars argues we cannot have any such direct awareness, for our intellect and its categories must be involved in any of our awareness. This criticism may be attached to Quine’s holism and his

樸素

Mendacious

GEM

resistant

0921-8599 book, combining integratively-revised previously-published papers with entirely new chapters, challenges and treats some major problems in Kant’s philosophy not by means of new interpretations but by suggesting some variations on Kantian themes. Such variations are, in fact, reconstructions made ac

minimal

Book 2022s philosophy not by means of new interpretations but by suggesting some variations on Kantian themes. Such variations are, in fact, reconstructions made according to Kantian ideas and principles and yet cannot be extracted as such directly from his writings. The book?also analyses Kant‘s philosophy

Corroborate