找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Responding to Environmental Crimes; Lessons from New Zea Mark Wright Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 動詞
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:25:01 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:27:42 | 只看該作者
Explaining the Inappropriate Use: Form Versus Substanceversight or accountability, this does not explain why the councils themselves consider it acceptable to use the offences in this way. This is the topic of this chapter, and it is considered from a systemic perspective—is the legislation driving local authorities to act in this way? The Act’s offence
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:19:17 | 只看該作者
Lessons Learnedtance of any offences, penalties and institutional arrangements for prosecuting with their criminal form. Second, it shows that collecting good data on the use of offences requires an understanding as to how the criminal law works. Third, and perhaps most importantly, the case study raises serious q
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:48:34 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:19:42 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:08:32 | 只看該作者
Explaining the Lack of Effectiveness: Constraints and Choicestter, local authorities use prosecution sparingly and, when they do prosecute, they seek compensatory outcomes. The conclusion reached is that the approach taken by councils to prosecutions appears distinctly “non-criminal”.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:04:19 | 只看該作者
Explaining the Inappropriate Use: Form Versus Substanceit is not surprising they are used inappropriately. Indeed, the conclusion reached is that, in substance, the offences, penalties and institutional arrangements for prosecuting are more akin to those found with civil causes of action.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:31:41 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:11:46 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:17:47 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-24 11:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
霍山县| 通化市| 汉寿县| 通州市| 大石桥市| 将乐县| 海口市| 剑阁县| 哈巴河县| 准格尔旗| 长汀县| 岢岚县| 托克逊县| 麻江县| 永修县| 岑巩县| 禹州市| 绥芬河市| 伊宁市| 巩义市| 台湾省| 南康市| 龙岩市| 乳山市| 晋江市| 苍南县| 永德县| 泰顺县| 高碑店市| 塘沽区| 安义县| 息烽县| 镇江市| 武功县| 吴桥县| 宜宾县| 屏东县| 巢湖市| 老河口市| 昌黎县| 清水县|