找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Religious Rules, State Law, and Normative Pluralism - A Comparative Overview; Rossella Bottoni,Rinaldo Cristofori,Silvio Ferrari Book 2016

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Buren
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 09:45:15 | 只看該作者
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 14:18:25 | 只看該作者
Religious Rules and the Law of the Dutch Statevelopment can be discerned that religiously informed ethics or social traditions no longer run parallel with the generally applicable norms, but are acknowledged through legislative exemptions or even no longer accommodated by the law. Processes of value change both outside and within religious denominations play a role in these developments.
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 18:22:03 | 只看該作者
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 23:26:04 | 只看該作者
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 00:54:08 | 只看該作者
Religious Rules and Principles in Belgian Lawmes the concept is largely open to include any individual feeling of religious duty. Sometimes the concept is only open to registered religions, sometimes it includes any kind of religious or philosophical groups. This report chooses a generous understanding of the concept, while focusing it on traditional religions.
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 05:57:52 | 只看該作者
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 12:04:47 | 只看該作者
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 13:45:14 | 只看該作者
State Norms, Religious Norms, and Claims of Plural Normativity under Democratic Constitutionsame of religious or cultural beliefs and practices. In many Western liberal democracies, legal pluralism is high on the agenda of law and religion scholars because State centred legality fails to do justice to the complexity of social and normative interactions. Legal pluralism provides the intellec
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 20:43:14 | 只看該作者
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 23:32:40 | 只看該作者
Legal Pluralism: Freedom of Religion, Exemptions and the Equality of Citizensjurisdiction. It is often seen therefore to be a challenge to legal centralism or the thesis that the sovereign state has a monopoly over law making to the exclusion of all other sources. It is helpful to make a distinction between ‘weak legal pluralism’ and ‘strong legal pluralism’. The former refe
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-24 13:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
唐山市| 竹溪县| 敦化市| 常宁市| 墨玉县| 青川县| 府谷县| 铁岭市| 渑池县| 长丰县| 双辽市| 东台市| 凌海市| 化德县| 万源市| 镇江市| 姚安县| 新野县| 广汉市| 民权县| 宽城| 漳浦县| 南宫市| 双鸭山市| 巴楚县| 肇东市| 珠海市| 灵武市| 广东省| 清河县| 嘉禾县| 边坝县| 乡城县| 天等县| 安远县| 长泰县| 隆子县| 安溪县| 青龙| 武川县| 马鞍山市|