Titlebook: Regime Consequences; Methodological Chall Arild Underdal,Oran R. Young Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004 Nation.democracy

繁殖

Causal Mechanisms and the Study of International Environmental Regimesapplied social science. Recently, it has also turned up in the literature on international environmental regimes. A common motivation for invoking the concept seems to be a desire to open up the black box between a cause and its effect, that is, to analyze in detail exactly . the cause relates to th

不公開

defuse

配偶

Formal Theory and Regime Effectiveness: Rational Players, Irrational Regimesis provided, it can be enjoyed whether or not an individual or a nation has made sacrifices to maintain it. So it may well be rational to free-ride on others’ contributions to the solution of the problem, unless there are strong nation-specific benefits from cooperating.. This often leads to the fai

AER

Does Regime Robustness Require a Fair Distribution of the Gains from Cooperation?ice is shared in one way or another by numerous contemporary philosophers and social scientists. John Rawls (1993: 38f), for instance, argues that a well-ordered and stable society presupposes an “overlapping consensus” of its citizens regarding fundamental conceptions of social justice. Without suc

許可

Methodological Issues in the Study of Broader Consequences that a regime could be established largely in isolation from other regimes and that its consequences were concentrated to its own domain. In the real world, the international system is increasingly densely populated by international governing institutions. A study elaborated for the Rio Summit of 1

性上癮

Exploring Regime Interactionld of international environmental protection alone; with five major agreements being adopted per year since the 1980s (Beisheim et al. 1999; see also Sand 1992). While these institutions usually are separately established to respond to particular problems, they increasingly affect each others’ devel

ENACT

AMEND

吞沒