Titlebook: Recognition of Governments; Legal Doctrine and S M. J. Peterson Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 19

CRAFT

Aura231

鐵砧

Recognition in Bilateral Relations,st legal scholars’ work and governments’ summaries of practice, information about the impact of recognition or nonrecognition is presented in two discussions: one on the effects of recognition or nonrecognition, and the other on which acts may be interpreted as conveying tacit recognition. This chap

透明

Recognition in Multilateral Relations, large array of global and regional organizations dealing with just about every conceivable political, economic, social, cultural, and technical issue. These relations involve inter-government contacts of various types: regional heads of government meetings, the foreign ministers’ meetings of the Co

鬼魂

伴隨而來

Political Uses of Recognition,iming and reasons for them creates the possibility of using recognition decisions for political purposes. Most legal scholars have paid some attention to this activity, mainly to condemn it as introducing elements of arbitrariness that do not belong in a well-ordered recognition process. Students of

手工藝品

聚集

The International System and Recognition of Governments,ion through which the human agents with authority to act on behalf of each state are identified. It is one area in which international law is closely linked to national law. A government succeeding to power according to the constitution, basic law, or established domestic custom is assumed to succee

明智的人

f recognition. It traces the evolution from the 19th century practice basing recognition mainly on effective rule to more frequent use of additional criteria in the interwar and early Cold War, to the reassertion of the primacy of effective rule since 1970 and places it in the context of contemporan

occult