找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Realism, Philosophy and Social Science; Kathryn Dean,Jonathan Joseph,Colin Wight Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 20946|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:23:21 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science
編輯Kathryn Dean,Jonathan Joseph,Colin Wight
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/823/822364/822364.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Realism, Philosophy and Social Science;  Kathryn Dean,Jonathan Joseph,Colin Wight Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub
描述The authors examine the relationship between social science and philosophy and ask what sort of work social science and an accompanying philosophy should do. They reintroduce the question of ontology, through the work of Roy Bhaskar. The book argues against philosophising and is committed to a philosophical approach grounded in the social sciences.
出版日期Book 2006
關(guān)鍵詞liberty; Marxism; philosophy; realism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502079
isbn_softcover978-1-349-52384-9
isbn_ebook978-0-230-50207-9
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2006
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Realism, Philosophy and Social Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:59:46 | 只看該作者
Realism, Marxism and Method, and often increasingly radical claims about the nature of human life and the best method of studying it. The roots of this fragmentation lie in the 1960s, when a deeply held sense of dissatisfaction with mainstream social theory led to the search for alternatives to the positivism that had come to
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:18:51 | 只看該作者
Realism, Science and Emancipation,ositivist orthodoxy, the answer for we ‘moderns’ has been ‘no’; facts and values are distinct realms and one cannot inform the other. For many of the theories falling under the label of ‘critical social science’, however, the answer is a resounding ‘yes’, even if the precise nature of the link is as
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:12:42 | 只看該作者
Method, Marxism and Critical Realism,atural world (on the latter see, for example, Levins and Lewontin 1985). While Marxists recognise that all three areas are linked together, they also recognise differences between them. Marxists who explore the ontology of the world highlight those observable and unobservable exploitative social str
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:46:31 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:04:05 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:50:56 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:47:37 | 只看該作者
Conclusion: Debating the Issues,what is useful in this tradition while criticising more recent work. The problem is that taking such an approach can end up with a narrowly defined project. We wanted to show the usefulness of a critical realist approach by relating it to broader issues in social science, and to Marxist ideas in particular.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:58:15 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:32:19 | 只看該作者
Realism, Science and Emancipation,ay that they stand in a symbiotic relationship. One feeds off the other in what might be described as a dialectical process; albeit an antagonistic one. Dialectical processes, however, at least as commonly understood, always involve a moment of . Two dialectical protagonists, that is, necessarily le
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 12:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
嵊泗县| 淄博市| 普宁市| 广灵县| 南皮县| 东宁县| 六安市| 波密县| 吉木乃县| 白水县| 娄烦县| 侯马市| 乐安县| 赤壁市| 山东省| 安平县| 平山县| 喀喇沁旗| 望城县| 台江县| 阳山县| 武宣县| 上高县| 台东市| 汉阴县| 北宁市| 延津县| 岢岚县| 东方市| 阿尔山市| 新和县| 珠海市| 通化县| 汶川县| 溧水县| 合水县| 江陵县| 彭水| 云梦县| 德保县| 宜宾市|