找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate; Bradley Jay Strawser,Lisa Hajjar,John Fabian Witt Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of N

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 44492|回復(fù): 47
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:43:48 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate
編輯Bradley Jay Strawser,Lisa Hajjar,John Fabian Witt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/703/702480/702480.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate;  Bradley Jay Strawser,Lisa Hajjar,John Fabian Witt Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of N
描述Does the lethal use of drones pose any new or difficult moral problems? Or is the controversy over these weapons merely a distraction from deeper questions regarding the justice of war and the United States‘ bellicose foreign policy? Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate pulls no punches in answering these questions as five scholars square off in a lively debate over the ethics of drones and their contentious use in a point-counterpoint debate. The contributing authors are some of the foremost thinkers in international affairs today, spanning the disciplines of philosophy, sociology, political science, and law. Topics debated range from the US‘s contested policy of so-called "targeted killing" in Pakistan‘s tribal regions to fears over the damaging effects such weaponry has on our democratic institutions to the more abstract moral questions raised by killing via remote control such as the duty to capture over kill.
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Drone; Drones; UAVs; targeted killing; FATA region; Pakistan; Yemen; Afghanistan; ethics; morality; terrorism;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432636
isbn_softcover978-1-349-49249-7
isbn_ebook978-1-137-43263-6
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:41:48 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:46:47 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:51:40 | 只看該作者
A Sociological Intervention on Drones and Targeted Killingre. To date, only Israel and the United States have adopted a policy of targeted killing. Their assertions that the practice of targeted killing is lawful under international law have not obtained international credibility but rather have become the subject of rising controversy..
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:53:18 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:25:08 | 只看該作者
eeper questions regarding the justice of war and the United States‘ bellicose foreign policy? Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate pulls no punches in answering these questions as five scholars square off in a lively debate over the ethics of drones and their contentious use in a point-counterp
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:51:58 | 只看該作者
Book 2014ical science, and law. Topics debated range from the US‘s contested policy of so-called "targeted killing" in Pakistan‘s tribal regions to fears over the damaging effects such weaponry has on our democratic institutions to the more abstract moral questions raised by killing via remote control such as the duty to capture over kill.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:30:10 | 只看該作者
On Adopting a Posture of Moral Neutralityiological warfare were added to the list of hotly controversial new technologies of combat. Closer to our own time, we see protests against antipersonnel landmines, munitions with undetectable fragments, incendiaries, and blinding laser weapons.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:28:38 | 只看該作者
Book 2014tions regarding the justice of war and the United States‘ bellicose foreign policy? Opposing Perspectives on the Drone Debate pulls no punches in answering these questions as five scholars square off in a lively debate over the ethics of drones and their contentious use in a point-counterpoint debat
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:04:33 | 只看該作者
978-1-349-49249-7Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 22:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
西盟| 扶沟县| 桐梓县| 府谷县| 铁岭市| 工布江达县| 孟津县| 新民市| 云浮市| 耿马| 克山县| 昆明市| 浦城县| 建德市| 阿拉尔市| 香港 | 白沙| 岳阳市| 余江县| 巴林右旗| 隆尧县| 瑞丽市| 禹城市| 定兴县| 梁平县| 朝阳市| 平度市| 永吉县| 鹤庆县| 通道| 高青县| 新密市| 山西省| 宝鸡市| 渭南市| 鞍山市| 河北区| 武平县| 黄浦区| 罗山县| 湘阴县|