Titlebook: Oakeshott’s Skepticism, Politics, and Aesthetics; Eric S. Kos Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive l

miniature

Michael Oakeshott Philosopher of Skepticism: Conservative or Liberal?, liberalism à la Mises, Hayek etc.? The author‘s answer goes beyond the alternative, outlining the specific characteristics of the skeptical philosophy of the English thinker. It is a sustained attempt to move us away from asking the question in the ideological manner in which it is posed and so, in

不要不誠實

終端

,A Conservative Landscape: From , to the “Claims of Politics”,hott’s anti-rationalist, skeptical perspective by examining how he approached the topic of handicapping horse racing. Like politics, and practical life more generally, horse racing requires experience in the face of contingency and suggests a conservative and playful (poetic) response is the appropr

虛情假意

大喘氣

散步

Oakeshott, Strauss and the Romans,ing the puzzling (relative) silence of Strauss and on the place of Roman thought in this history. It suggests the Straussian narrative that early modern thinkers “dethroned” the contemplative life and elevated the importance of practical concerns, are part of a strategy to fill the vacuum and counte

Spongy-Bone

Ancestor

POWER

欺騙手段

The Problem of a Pure Theory of Poetry,he history of poetry in extracting a meaning out of it, and it left to one side most of the questions about poetry which are of interest to poets, critics or indeed anyone. This chapter places Oakeshott’s theory of poetry in the context of theories of poetry from Aristotle through Johnson, Wordswort