Titlebook: Asia‘s Giants; Comparing China and Edward Friedman (professor in the Department of Po Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature A

起草

文字

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3832-1pecialists writing for this book build on new subnational and sectoral literatures and offer informed judgments on future trajectories for China and India. These diverse authors take a host of different approaches to judging how well Asia’s giants, China and India are doing today and what ongoing dy

fidelity

Vulnerable

Ecophysiology of intertidal fish,] 1956, 103) Nearly a century later, the words have a deep resonance. Despite decades of calls by outsiders for a more coercive, planned, even revolutionary approach to political and economic development, India has remained steady indeed. Gandhi’s hope lay in the idea that repression and violence we

使尷尬

INCH

Bioaccumulation of contaminants in fish,g time, China’s economy was growing much faster than India’s, but that gap too has closed substantially. In recent years, China has received vastly more foreign direct investment (FDI) than India, but India does almost as well with nonethnic Chinese investors. Indian imports still lag behind China’s

集聚成團(tuán)

Energetics of Feeding and Digestiongit growth and high Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) levels with India’s slower growth rate and much lower FDI levels. This contrast is usually attributed to democracy in India, which, it is argued, has negative costs for economic performance.. In addition, it is believed that decentralization in Chi

使迷惑

Adaptive Aspects of Energy Allocationion-states roughly contemporaneously—there are stark differences in their development trajectories. Equally important, there are pros and cons to the models chosen by the two countries even if one restricts the comparison to the economic domain.

CAB

執(zhí)