Titlebook: New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences; Some Moral Implicati William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph Book 19821st edition D. R

忍受

Moral Issues Relating to the Economics of New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciencesy medical research. Nevertheless, there remains the economists’ uncompromising question regarding the actual structure of the relationship between resource investment and product output. In particular, the problem arises of whether, as science progresses, a fixed amount of effort continues to yield

開始發(fā)作

Morality and the Social Control of Biomedical Technologye, artificial organs, blood for the treatment of hemophilia, donors for organ transplant operations, and research facilities are all in limited supply. Often when research presents us with a new technology, we find ourselves uncertain whether to fund its application and, if so, how extensively to pr

贊美者

Rights and Responsibilities in Medical Science modern Luddites who, despite, or perhaps because of their ignorance of the . of clinical medicine, seem intent on destroying not only the evident advantages that modern medical technology has provided for the common weal, but also on inhibiting the potential for future advantages that will accrue t

勾引

Health, Justice, and Responsibilitying us. In discussing the issue of the fair allocation of health resources, we tend to talk about . obligations as a society, and we are, I think, tempted to forget that . obligation is always in the end . obligation and . obligation. . obligation is not anonymous, but personal. Towers’s discussion

浮雕寶石

懸掛

Medical Knowledge as a Social Product: Rights, Risks, and Responsibilitiesse a problem: the need for a theoretical model of medicine in terms of which to approach the crisis. I will go on to analyze the problem in terms of some of the fundamental concepts involved in the construction of the theoretical model — specifically, the nature of medical knowledge, and the rights,

冥想后

Mirage

Applying Morality to Advances in Biomedicine: Can and should this be Done?f sorts — bioethics. This is not to say that advances in medical science prior to the 1960’s and 1970’s moved ahead with little attention to moral concerns. Nor is it to say that biomedical research and therapy prior to the 1960’s was conducted in an immoral or amoral manner. Rather, as new advances

placebo

Biomedicine, Health Care Policy, and the Adequacy of Ethical Theoryg biomedical technologies and health care policy concerned with the funding and allocation of those technologies: He begins his criticism with a review of the “ethics backlash”, the response of some within the scientific and medical communities to debate concerning the ethical dimensions of their en

凹室