找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: National Security Exceptions in International Trade and Investment Agreements; Justiciability and S Sebastián Mantilla Blanco,Alexander Peh

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Affordable
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:55:32 | 只看該作者
The First Generation of National Security Exceptions: The GATT and Its Legacy,ecurity exception grants a Member State discretion to adopt trade-restrictive security measures which ‘. necessary for the protection of its essential security interests’. An analysis of the GATT exception’s wording, object and purpose, and drafting history, shows that such discretion was never inte
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:17:19 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:32:57 | 只看該作者
The Third Generation of National Security Exceptions: Protecting the Sovereign State,on is driven by the goal of ensuring that the State enjoys an ample degree of discretion in the protection of its security interests. Reluctance to interpret security exceptions as self-judging provisions has led some States to go as far as to include explicit language excluding them from the scope
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:59:03 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,f-judging nature to the choice between different standards of review. At the same time, a new generation of treaties is introducing clauses which could be genuinely self-judging. No case involving such clauses has yet been adjudicated.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:20:01 | 只看該作者
SpringerBriefs in Lawhttp://image.papertrans.cn/n/image/661485.jpg
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:46:54 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38125-7National Security; Traffic in Transit; Necessity in Investment Law; Investment Law; WTO; World Trade Orga
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:23:41 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:31:14 | 只看該作者
The First Generation of National Security Exceptions: The GATT and Its Legacy,ecurity exception grants a Member State discretion to adopt trade-restrictive security measures which ‘. necessary for the protection of its essential security interests’. An analysis of the GATT exception’s wording, object and purpose, and drafting history, shows that such discretion was never intended to apply without limits.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:55:40 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:59:57 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,f-judging nature to the choice between different standards of review. At the same time, a new generation of treaties is introducing clauses which could be genuinely self-judging. No case involving such clauses has yet been adjudicated.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-18 17:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
岱山县| 沙田区| 临城县| 凤台县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 阿克陶县| 杭州市| 阿克苏市| 佛教| 云浮市| 沅江市| 兴化市| 个旧市| 阿合奇县| 柏乡县| 吉水县| 米泉市| 秭归县| 临安市| 海丰县| 五大连池市| 连州市| 桂平市| 乐亭县| 日土县| 宁都县| 双桥区| 恩施市| 龙海市| 高台县| 伊宁县| 罗甸县| 土默特右旗| 岳阳县| 凤台县| 浙江省| 大洼县| 宜兴市| 邻水| 库伦旗| 临安市|