Titlebook: Metaphysics Through Semantics: The Philosophical Recovery of the Medieval Mind; Essays in Honor of G Joshua P. Hochschild,Turner C. Nevitt,

Working-Memory

0066-6610 new research.Showcases a broad scope of topics associated w.“More than any other living scholar of medieval philosophy, Gyula Klima has influenced the way we read and understand philosophical texts by showing how the questions they ask can be placed in a modern context without loss or distortion.?T

OWL

“The Essential Differentiae of Things are Unknown to Us”: Thomas Aquinas on the Limits of the Knowabmes on things moving from their accidents. Such claims may be read as introducing a skeptical concern. On the contrary, they express a form of phenomenal realism, which Aquinas reconciles with representationalism in knowledge.

SUE

Metaphors, Dead and Aliver of sense without new imposition is more plausible when it comes to explaining metaphors. If metaphorical use is lumped together with equivocation, the account of how they work cannot do full justice to either, an insight that we already find in Peter Abelard, if not in Boethius.

monologue

Book 2023how the questions they ask can be placed in a modern context without loss or distortion.?The key to his approach is a respect for medieval authors coupled with a commitment to regarding their texts as a genuine source of insight on questions in metaphysics, theology, psychology, logic, and the philo

Nostalgia

Pythagoras, the Philosopher and Grammar Teacher (Br. Lib. Add. MS 37516 ,)istic usage. This injunction is funny, because it can be construed as Pythagoras railing against the use of a particular variant form of an adjective—and also as against the use of items denoted by that adjective. In the paper I add to this line of interpretation the further point that the . also cl

完成

Abelard on Existential Inferenceern problem, and that his own take on the logical issues that are said to give rise to the problem is much more interesting and subtle than has usually been acknowledged, depending on claims in the philosophy of language that are worthy of investigation in their own right—in the end, vindicating Abe

刺耳

Rereading “Saint Anselm’s Proof”retation of Aquinas’s criticisms of attempts to argue that the existence (and other attributes) of God can be ., such that no “cosmological” argument (.) is necessary for “God” to serve as the central concept in .. Klima’s criticism of Anselm appears to be misplaced, since Anselm does not claim that

撫育

貝雷帽

Decline