Titlebook: Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice; Klaus Petrus Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010 comm

quick-relievers

書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice被引頻次




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice年度引用




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice讀者反饋




書目名稱Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Filibuster

Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Ordinary Language,nitial enthusiasm, growing uneasiness and distance, but continued loyalty. Along with John L. Austin and Peter F. Strawson, Grice is one of the philosophers now most readily associated with the Oxford-based movement. Indeed his theory of conversation is widely regarded, among linguists at least, as

教義

,Intuition, the Paradigm Case Argument, and the Two Dogmas of Kant’otelianism,hilosophy, was one in which H. Paul Grice and Sir Peter Strawson defended the analytic/synthetic distinction against Morton White’s and Quine’s arguments against it (in 1956, in 1950, and in 1951 respectively). I shall specifically examine Grice and Strawson’s Paradigm Case Argument in support of th

otic-capsule

Grice on Presupposition,mplicature’ that discusses some issues related to presupposition.. In this essay, henceforth referred to as P&CI, Grice is concerned with the debate between Russell and Strawson as to whether the implications of existence and uniqueness associated with the use of definite descriptions in sentences o

微生物

Flawless

A Gricean View on Intrusive Implicatures,ch are apparently generated by subordinate clauses, or which fall under the scope of a logical operator (typically both). Such cases, for reasons to be detailed below, pose a challenge to Grice’s account. While those who have posed the challenge, ranging from advocates of truth-conditional pragmatic

Popcorn

Speaker-Meaning, Conversational Implicature and Calculability,eaning Exhaustiveness’. And yet, as I have argued elsewhere (Saul 2002) this seems to be in clear conflict with Grice’s famous three-clause characterization of conversational implicature (1989: 30–1), which is also widely accepted. Legitimate worries can be raised, however, about the correct interpr

制定

欺騙世家

narcissism