Titlebook: Ma(r)king the Difference; Multiculturalism and Tania Mancheno Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

FLAW

書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference被引頻次




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference年度引用




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference讀者反饋




書目名稱Ma(r)king the Difference讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Foam-Cells

the 16th to the 21st century in central Europe and the Americas. The surplus lies in the inclusion of colonial history in the genealogy of Western political thought and ideas, as well as in the postcolonial discussion of multiculturalism. The manuscript deals with the power and authority of translat

miniature

Book 2023o the 21st century in central Europe and the Americas. The surplus lies in the inclusion of colonial history in the genealogy of Western political thought and ideas, as well as in the postcolonial discussion of multiculturalism. The manuscript deals with the power and authority of translation provid

single

Translation and the Question of Minorities, the adaptability, hence, the translatability of racism into language and culture, translation can be defined as a political tool that deals with differences: It ensures the survival of the original and is an act of violence, through which identities are created. Translation either generates life or condemns differences to cultural death.

MARS

Translation in the Valladolid Debate,tly, the concept of the Indian will be employed as catalyzer for historiographical (ex-)changes in the 16. century. Following Koselleck and Pocock, both concepts will be treated as figures of the difference that illustrates the intertwining between the religious and secular visions of history.

GLIDE

Glower

formula

978-3-658-40923-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wies

Congeal

良心

Translation: Moral Imperative or Colonial Question?,tual debates. Focusing on the relations between conceptual and social history, the comparison highlights the translatability of differences in each debate. The pattern narrating the (trans)formation of identities suggests that these constitute . practices.