Titlebook: Lutheran Reformers Against Anabaptists; Luther, Melanchthon John S. Oyer Book 1964 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1964 Germany.M

統(tǒng)治人類

Nonporous

The ,, Luther, and Melanchthon, both unwanted and unexpected by the Reformer himself. He was forced to take issue with the extremists in order to guide the Reformation into more conservative channels. The examination of these unruly elements, called the . by Luther, must begin with the Prophets of Zwickau. They were the first to

Annotate

Anabaptism in Central Germany I, were men who were dissatisfied with what they considered the half-way measures of the Reformers, or non-Catholics who differed fundamentally with the theological formulations of the Reformers. One scholar has recently analyzed the extremists under the name Radical Reformation. As a fourth form of r

積極詞匯

不可知論

Luther and the Anabaptists,r its free and unhindered course. Men had always tried to make themselves and their own inventions more important than the Word itself. So the Roman church had done. Over the centuries it had raised formidable blocks to the progress of the Word. In the first rank stood the blockade of Pelagianism: t

ABOUT

absolve

Menius and the Anabaptists,ereof he wrote. He had more contacts with the Anabaptists than did any of the Lutheran opponents of the radicals in Central Germany.. His position as superintendent at Eisenach after 1529 brought him into the heart of West Thuringian Anabaptist territory. He knew Rink, though how well it is impossib

思想

lactic

Evaluation of the Lutheran Writings Against the Anabaptists,nabaptism used by Luther, Melanchthon, and Menius? What precisely does their Anabaptism consist of? Whom do they regard as typical Anabaptists? How does their picture of the movement compare with that derived from other sources, from the Anabaptists themselves? These are questions which require our

泄露