找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Logic Without Gaps or Gluts; How to Solve the Par Benjamin Alan Burgis Book 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Paraconsistent logic.D

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 7799|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:41:37 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts
副標(biāo)題How to Solve the Par
編輯Benjamin Alan Burgis
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/588/587945/587945.mp4
概述Argues that the paradoxes give no reason to reject classical logic.The first full-length book to deal with this topic indepthly.Touches on the work of Graham Priest, Hartry Field and JC Beal.
叢書(shū)名稱Synthese Library
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Logic Without Gaps or Gluts; How to Solve the Par Benjamin Alan Burgis Book 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Paraconsistent logic.D
描述.This book offers a defense against non-classical approaches to the paradoxes. The author argues that, despite appearances, the paradoxes give no reason at all to reject classical logic. In fact, he believes classical solutions fare better than non-classical ones with respect to key tests like Curry’s Paradox, a Liar-like paradox that dialetheists are forced to solve in a way totally disjoint from their solution to the Liar. ..Graham Priest’s .In Contradiction?.was the first major work that advocated the use of non-classical approaches. Since then, these views have moved into the philosophical mainstream. Much of this movement is fueled by a widespread sense that these logically heterodox solutions get to the real nub of the issue. They lack the ad hoc feel of many other solutions to the paradoxes. The author believes that it‘s long past time for a response to these attacks against classical orthodoxy. He presents a non-logically-revisionary solution to the paradoxes...This title offers a literal way of cashing out the disquotation metaphor. While the details of the view are novel, the idea has a pre-history in the relevant literature. The author examines objections in detail. He r
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞Paraconsistent logic; Dialetheism Excluded Middle; Disquotationalism; Graham Priest; Hartry Field; JC Bea
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94624-1
isbn_softcover978-3-030-94626-5
isbn_ebook978-3-030-94624-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Logic Without Gaps or Gluts讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:38:10 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:24:04 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:33:49 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:30:45 | 只看該作者
Logic Without Gaps or Gluts978-3-030-94624-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:13:00 | 只看該作者
Logic and the Liar Paradox,e (LEM) and the Law of Non-Contradiction (LNC). Dialetheists such as Graham Priest and JC Beall solve the paradoxes by accepting the negations of some instances of the LNC and rejecting classical logic in favor of a “paraconsistent” logical framework in which contradictions do not entail every concl
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:09:38 | 只看該作者
Graham Priest and Dialetheism,st argument for dialetheism. Indeed, apart from Graham Priest, most dialetheists regard contradicts about the alethetic status of paradoxical sentences as the . true contradictions. Priest, however, has made independent arguments for true contradictions in several other domains. He postulates true m
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:00:53 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:21:43 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:20:39 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 13:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
广元市| 政和县| 澄城县| 宁波市| 蛟河市| 璧山县| 龙井市| 怀宁县| 双江| 延长县| 白城市| 佛教| 屏南县| 金溪县| 平凉市| 古田县| 遂昌县| 纳雍县| 秦皇岛市| 措勤县| 宜良县| 沐川县| 晋城| 兴山县| 武定县| 寿宁县| 应城市| 剑河县| 中西区| 平泉县| 锡林浩特市| 呼玛县| 左贡县| 萍乡市| 秀山| 商都县| 牙克石市| 科技| 浮梁县| 左云县| 宜黄县|