Titlebook: Life Sciences Research and Scientific Writing; Benno ter Kuile Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

性別

Presenting the Data,s to choose from. There are various considerations to select the best way to display a dataset, clarity for the reader being of the utmost importance. All artwork must present the information in a truthful manner, so that the reader will draw the correct conclusions. While graphs are more suitable f

Anticoagulants

Drafting the Manuscript,what to write about them. The Results section explains the reader what was actually observed. The Discussion interprets the data in the framework of the literature. The Introduction provides the reader with the required background information and formulates the questions that the study addresses. Th

diskitis

Affirm

Reviewing Manuscripts,ce. A lot of effort went into the manuscript offered to you, so take this duty seriously. Judge whether the data are presented well and support the conclusions before concentrating on minor points, such as sentences to be improved. If the data don’t match with the conclusions, a rejection or major r

antedate

Other Scientific Texts,rature on a given subject and attempt to formulate a common opinion based on all available information. A proposal centers around an important subject that you will elucidate for the benefit of mankind. The Methods section is crucial as the proposed methodology determines whether you will be able to

消耗

Circumscribe

騷擾

Guiding Junior Scientists,dent-supervisor relationship is a complex system of give-and-take. There are some general rules about how to supervise young colleagues, but the variation due to personality differences is large. Good supervision will enable the pupil to develop his abilities optimally. As a result, time invested in

平息

敏捷

Reviewing Manuscripts,ewrite will most likely be recommended, so minor points are irrelevant. Judge a paper on what is written, not on what is . there, but could have been, unless it is essential to the scientific story. In your reviewer report point out what is novel and interesting about the study and to which extent the paper is within the scope of the journal.