Titlebook: Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism; An Associational Cri Matt Dawson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

吞食

書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism網絡公開度




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism被引頻次




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism年度引用




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism讀者反饋




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism讀者反饋學科排名

chandel

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003423democracy; neoliberalism; political sociology; socialism; sociology

Conducive

http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/581772.jpg

全能

Veneer

Overview: Influenced most notably by émile Durkheim and Zygmunt Bauman, Dawson outlines how this long neglected stream of socialist theory can help us more fully understand, and possibly move beyond, the problems of neoliberalism and our conceptions of political individualism.978-1-349-43422-0978-1-137-00342-3

Preserve

節(jié)約

Privatization without Pluralism: The Late Modern Stated 6 expand upon the practical form that such a system could take. Here, attention is directed towards the state. In the next chapter the focus is economic activity and neoliberalism. These two are discussed separately partly because I reject, for reasons discussed below, the idea of the state being

著名

Responsibility without Power: Neoliberalism and Economic Democracyg discussion about forms of work,. it does suggest the inability to entirely leave the economic behind for late modern political sociology. This issue is central to our discussion of libertarian socialism in late modernity. The question of how neoliberalism impacts political individualization, in te

Lacerate

Introductionmpatibility is seen to have empirical and normative grounding. The world of socialist theory, with its industrialized working-class, collective organization and the extreme poverty of the proletariat, is seen as irrelevant to an individualized, middle-class and post-scarcity world of consumers which

NAVEN

The Political Sociology of Late Modernity: Political Individualization intended to be synonyms; late modernity encompasses the logic of social processes while neoliberalism classifies a type of capitalist economy. Since both focus upon claims of globalization and individualism, it may seem plausible that there is an ‘elective affinity’ between them. However, as this c