Titlebook: Languages at War; Policies and Practic Hilary Footitt,Michael Kelly Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limite

Suture

書(shū)目名稱Languages at War影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Languages at War讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

IVORY

Languages in the Intelligence Communityculties: files are not open, those most involved are bound by the Official Secrets Act not to discuss what they might have been doing. In the case of the Second World War, however, a great deal of information about the working of signals intelligence is now in the public domain. This chapter exploit

蟄伏

Frameworks for Understandings constructed in varying ways at different times. States, governments and intelligence services and the individuals who constitute these organizations rely on and develop discourses of the organizational and national self and its corresponding others: frameworks of understanding that fill the catego

Slit-Lamp

The Human in Human Intelligenceramount importance: interrogating those who might hold this information, in other words obtaining ‘human intelligence’ (Humint), was a key necessity throughout the whole conflict. Humint refers to the gathering of intelligence through interpersonal contact. According to the NATO ., it is ‘a(chǎn) category

發(fā)炎

血友病

Languages and Peace Operationseace in an environment that was foreign in language and culture (Malcolm 2002; Bose 2002). The first units were deployed in November of that year, as part of Operation Grapple, and included some 2400 British military personnel. Most of the fighting was ended by the Dayton Peace Agreement of December

銼屑

Language Policy and Peace-Buildingement in NATO’s operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina and how, as a result, their responses to the linguistic challenges were marked by improvisation and adhoc-ery. These were also characteristics of the language policy decisions of other national contingents involved in NATO’s initial operations, and of

drusen

貝雷帽

Fraternizationmand: ‘non-fraternisation is the avoidance of mingling with Germans upon terms of friendliness, familiarity or intimacy, whether individually or in groups, in official or unofficial dealings’.. There was to be no visiting of German homes, no drinking with Germans, no shaking hands, no giving or rece

外星人