Titlebook: Language, Normativity and Europeanisation; Discursive Evidence Heiko Motschenbacher Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

magenta

and faster patientcare. Being the gateway to the health system, the general practice environment has been one of the target areas for MyHR adoption. Aim: This doctoral qualitative research aims to investigate MyHR adoption in the general practices of Victoria and explore its users’ views/experience

龍蝦

Introduction, led to the inclusion of no less than 28 European countries, with still more candidate countries (Albania [ALB], Macedonia [MAC], Montenegro [MNT], Serbia [SER], and Turkey [TUR]) awaiting membership. Moreover, the EU member states have recently started to establish closer ties with some Eastern Eur

etidronate

Immunoglobulin

,The Language–Identity–Normativity Interface and Critical Discourse Studies, mainly in sociolinguistics (e.g. Omoniyi 2006), anthropological linguistics (e.g. McElhinny 2003), applied linguistics (e.g. Block 2006) and discourse analysis (e.g. Benwell and Stokoe 2006). Early variationist work (e.g. Labov 1966; Trudgill 1972) treated sociodemographic data as a pre-given, obje

Humble

Code-Switching Practices in ESC Performances,able codes. Such a procedure builds on traditional and still dominant discourses that construct “l(fā)anguages” as self-evident and clearly delineable linguistic systems, often associated with particular nations. This conceptualisation has for a long time affected not just linguistics but also language

exigent

極大痛苦

火車車輪

Prevalent Discourses in ESC Lyrics,herefore concentrates on the intertextual dimension of meaning negotiation and materialistion in the contest. The theoretical discussion of intertextuality has to a large extent been advanced outside linguistics (especially in literary studies, drawing on the work of Kristeva and Bakhtin; see e.g. A

一罵死割除

Overview,ities in the light of (what is perceived as being compatible with) Europeanness. In this final chapter, central language-based discursive mechanisms of identity construction that have been documented in the preceding empirical chapters are reviewed and discussed with respect to their contribution to

注意力集中