Titlebook: Knowledge and Power in the Philosophies of ?amīd al-Dīn Kirmānī and Mullā ?adrā Shīrāzī; Sayeh Meisami Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applica

燕麥

,?amīd al-Dīn Kirmānī on the Human Soul and Knowledge,atonic discourses, his adoption of Neoplatonic narratives in his cognitive psychology is best understood in light of the Shī?ī discourse of the epistemic authority of the imam and the ranks below him within the Fatimid institution.

audiologist

strain

要求比…更好

,Mullā ?adrā on Knowledge and the Imamate,thor to understand the potential in Mullā ?adrā’s synthetic discourse which she sees as playing a part in shaping the discourse of Shī?ī imamate as the source of both spiritual and political authority. In examining Mullā ?adrā’s theory of knowledge and the human soul, primary reference is made to his . and parts of .

REP

Book 2018strating the mutual empowerment of discourses on knowledge formation and religio-political authority in certain Isma?ili and Twelver contexts. The book investigates concepts, narratives, and arguments that have contributed to the generation and development of the discourse on the absolute authority

BAIL

Introduction,pistemology/psychology and those of Shī?ī authority in their complex religious and political applications. The author argues that the possibility of historical confluence aside, the two fields share narratives, arguments, statements, and concepts. She also highlights the synthetic methodology which

同步信息

星球的光亮度

,Kirmānī’s Discourse on the Imamate and its Influence,pect the author makes three arguments. First, Kirmānī constructs a conceptual scheme that accommodates a rational formulation of the imamate based on Aristotelian psychology and Plotinus’ doctrine of emanation. Second, the synthetic discourse that he employs in this respect culminates in an existent

ADORN

,Mullā ?adrā on Knowledge and the Imamate,owledge and the soul. Next, she analyzes his discourse of the imamate and absolute authority, which arguably rests on his theory of knowledge. Since much work has already been done on Mullā ?adrā’s epistemology and psychology, the analysis is focused on those concepts and narratives that lead the au

異教徒

,Mullā ?adrā’s Legacy and Concluding Remarks,rse of Shī?ī political authority, prominently the guardianship of the jurist (.) in contemporary Iran. The author briefly reviews the discursive legacy of Mullā ?adrā in the formation and development of the discourse on the absolute religio-political authority of top jurists. The chapter follows the