找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium; An Institutional and Tim Bunjevac Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sprin

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 53510|回復(fù): 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:55:34 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium
副標(biāo)題An Institutional and
編輯Tim Bunjevac
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/502/501416/501416.mp4
概述Develops an original court governance policy framework for judge-managed courts based on synthesis of international best practices.Can be used as a policy manual to assist court administration scholar
叢書(shū)名稱Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium; An Institutional and Tim Bunjevac Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sprin
描述This book is a comparative study of judge-managed court systems across Australia, Europe and North America. This book makes an original contribution to the literature of court administration by providing a framework for examining court-service models of judicial councils, the policymaking bodies of courts and tribunals. This book promises to assist court administration scholars, judicial leaders, and policymakers in devising more effective organizational solutions to the contemporary challenges of judicial self-governance.?.The author Dr. Tim Bunjevac offers a nuanced elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration and a model institutional framework of court governance, comparing key Australian and international models of court administration, including the Australian Federal and two state court systems, Irish, English, Canadian and Dutch models. With a close case study, the author puts his sharpest focus on the Victoria, Australia, which introduced a judicial council in 2014.?.This book does an innovative job of proposing a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration. This book proposes that the likely success of any court system reform ultim
出版日期Book 2020
關(guān)鍵詞Judicial review; Judicial administration; Self-Governance; Constitutional law; Administrative law; Public
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6506-3
isbn_softcover978-981-33-6508-7
isbn_ebook978-981-33-6506-3Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightThe Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:11:12 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:49:01 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:12:15 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:01:50 | 只看該作者
Tim Bunjevacerg unter Verwendung von Schacht?fen einer zur Zeitenwende üblichen Bauart und mittels einer damals vermutlich gebr?uchlichen Arbeitsweise nennenswerte Mengen kohlenstoffreicheren Stahls und auch Roheisens zu gewinnen. Damit wurde in übereinstimmung mit den bekannten thermodynamischen Grundlagen ers
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:51:44 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:07:22 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:01:51 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:43:26 | 只看該作者
Judicial Control of Court Administration, with an analysis of the traditional arguments in favour of greater judicial control of court administration, before moving on to propose a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:06:14 | 只看該作者
Models of Court Governance,ustralian, Irish, English, Canadian federal and Dutch models. The analysis is used to identify the key features of each model and inform the development of a court governance analytical policy framework in Chap. . of the study.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 00:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
西畴县| 武鸣县| 安西县| 湟中县| 六枝特区| 白玉县| 凤城市| 抚顺县| 大理市| 扬中市| 灵台县| 洪泽县| 淮南市| 霍林郭勒市| 新绛县| 太白县| 于都县| 宾阳县| 晋江市| 调兵山市| 溆浦县| 石河子市| 崇明县| 延吉市| 仁化县| 齐齐哈尔市| 潞城市| 襄城县| 乐安县| 香港| 宁都县| 招远市| 怀化市| 惠来县| 锦州市| 延安市| 兴业县| 九台市| 仙居县| 许昌市| 潮州市|