找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts; Francesco Arcidiacono,Antonio Bova Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if appli

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 26812|回復(fù): 49
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:31:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts
編輯Francesco Arcidiacono,Antonio Bova
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/473/472652/472652.mp4
概述Provides a comprehensive overview of the interpersonal argumentative processes involved in educational and professional contexts.Identifies context-dependent differences and similarities in the ways i
圖書封面Titlebook: Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts;  Francesco Arcidiacono,Antonio Bova Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if appli
描述.This book provides a comprehensive overview of empirical studies based on various approaches devoted to examining the interpersonal argumentative processes involved in different contexts. It also identifies context-dependent similarities and differences in the ways in which argumentative interactions are managed by individuals in a range of educational and professional settings..How can some forms of negotiation, change and debate result from engaging in interpersonal processes during argumentation? How do interpersonal dimensions affect the interdependencies between argumentative exchanges and construction of knowledge and skills? The book clarifies these open questions by providing a discussion of theoretical and empirical issues at the forefront of research, in order to provide a view of how interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts is actually questioned and investigated..It offers readers an opportunity to discover the crucial importance of an in-depth understanding of the role and functions played by the interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions occurring in a wide range of educational and professional contexts..
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞social interactions; interpersonal relationships; knowledge construction; skills development; parenting;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86543-0
isbn_ebook978-3-319-59084-4
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts被引頻次




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts年度引用




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts讀者反饋




書目名稱Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:30:43 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:42:04 | 只看該作者
Reading Together: The Interplay Between Social and Cognitive Aspects in Argumentative and Non-argume how the two aspects are interrelated in children’s joint work. Focusing on participants’ talk while they are asked to solve together a reading comprehension task and to agree on a joint answer, we highlight the ways in which the process of dialogical construction of a common answer is influenced b
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:25:51 | 只看該作者
The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Argumentative Interactions in the Learning Contexts of Higher during regular lessons. The aim is to bring to light the strict relationship between the types of questions asked by the teacher and the beginning and development of argumentative disciplinary discussions in the classroom, i.e., task-related discussions concerning the discipline taught in the course
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:49:34 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:46:30 | 只看該作者
Processes of Negotiation in Socio-scientific Argumentation About Vegetarianism in Teacher Educationhared argument in a decision-making context. Argumentative interactions can be seen as processes involving negotiations (Baker in The role of communication in learning to model. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 303–324, ., Argumentation and education: theoretical foundations and practices. Springer
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:41:37 | 只看該作者
Argumentation and Conflict Management in Online Epistemic Communities: A Narrative Approach to Wiki of . such as open-source programming languages or encyclop?dias (for example, Wikipedia). In this chapter we focus on the case of Wikipedia, where general public participation has recently grown very quickly, in part due to egalitarian principles that encourage free participation by everyone. Howev
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:55:30 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:11:55 | 只看該作者
Imaginary Scenarios as Resources to Argue for Treatment Advice in Cancer Consultations,ents with all relevant information prior to treatment. Within a discursive and conversational approach, this chapter explores how an oncologist argues for treatment advice within cancer consultations. Drawing on a data set of video-recorded post-surgical cancer consultations collected in Italy, the
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:43:37 | 只看該作者
Notes on Similarities and Differences in Studying Argumentation: A Synthetic View,eoretical and empirical issues at the forefront of research, by ensuring a view of how interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts is presently questioned and investigated. The chapter highlights the common issues of the volume concerning the analysis of how people argue in
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-21 01:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
留坝县| 南木林县| 横山县| 牙克石市| 柳江县| 宁城县| 宁夏| 青州市| 神农架林区| 古丈县| 那坡县| 远安县| 内丘县| 资中县| 塔河县| 青神县| 灵璧县| 宜君县| 辽阳县| 贵德县| 古丈县| 达州市| 阿尔山市| 偃师市| 伽师县| 昌乐县| 都江堰市| 宿迁市| 璧山县| 阿尔山市| 平江县| 福海县| 丹阳市| 莱州市| 白银市| 桦川县| 攀枝花市| 岳池县| 新丰县| 建水县| 西吉县|