找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence; Donald H. Saklofske,Moshe Zeidner Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New Yo

[復制鏈接]
樓主: damped
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:47:22 | 只看該作者
Cognitive Interference personal preoccupations that interfere with attention to the task at hand. Personality can facilitate performance (e.g., through high motivation and the ability to become absorbed in tasks), but it can also debilitate it (e.g., through worrying about the consequences of failure and being uncooperative with the tester).
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:06:05 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:00:06 | 只看該作者
Theoretical and Empirical Relationships between Personality and Intelligencelity of interests for the different approaches to overlap. This is evident for areas of intellectual functioning like creativity or cognitive style (see Brody, 1972), but the prevailing tendency is to treat intelligence and personality as independent.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:13:51 | 只看該作者
Personality Trait Correlates of Intelligencek, 1985). Although some of the most influential figures in the field of intelligence and personality allude repeatedly to the inextricable web or nexus of interrelations among these two constructs (see Chapter 13), researchers have traditionally treated them as relatively independent factors in their analyses.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:53:45 | 只看該作者
978-1-4419-3239-6Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:07:20 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:55:43 | 只看該作者
Perspectives on Individual Differenceshttp://image.papertrans.cn/i/image/471628.jpg
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:19:19 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:05:00 | 只看該作者
The Interface between Intelligence and Personality as Determinants of Classroom LearningI find it helpful to consider the relationship between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning in terms of three broad questions:
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:26:30 | 只看該作者
Ideological Aspects of Research on Personality and Intelligence, the presence of a chapter on ideology has to be justified, or at least explained. Would the presentation of the field not have been complete without it? Do we really need this kind of reflection from the sidelines of actual research? At the outset, I also need to define (and possibly justify) my terms of reference.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 00:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
石城县| 扶沟县| 凌云县| 兴山县| 南丰县| 恩施市| 惠水县| 蚌埠市| 大新县| 手机| 巴彦淖尔市| 朔州市| 汉中市| 达日县| 金平| 岳阳市| 清苑县| 湾仔区| 古浪县| 阜阳市| 吴江市| 全椒县| 礼泉县| 安达市| 阜康市| 阿拉善盟| 临清市| 台中县| 溆浦县| 祥云县| 九台市| 安宁市| 白银市| 内江市| 海宁市| 洪洞县| 峨眉山市| 扶绥县| 砚山县| 宣汉县| 隆化县|