Titlebook: Interculturality in Education; A Theoretical and Me Fred Dervin Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Migration.Di

粘上

書目名稱Interculturality in Education影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Interculturality in Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interculturality in Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Interculturality in Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interculturality in Education被引頻次




書目名稱Interculturality in Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interculturality in Education年度引用




書目名稱Interculturality in Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interculturality in Education讀者反饋




書目名稱Interculturality in Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Inveterate

Misnomers,, identity, and collectivity. The concept of culture has always been central in research and practice of interculturality. Yet culture has been questioned in many other fields of research for being too solid and generalizing. A fluid approach to it is proposed. In a similar vein, the idea of identit

Jargon

Imaginaries About Interculturality,s—or myths—about interculturality. He discusses the myths related to the concepts of globalization, diversity, origins, ‘the same’, and the ‘local’. Deeply engrained in official practice and research discourses on interculturality, these imaginaries deserve to be defused and replaced with alternativ

mechanism

返老還童

,Interculturality and the ‘Fragilities’ of Human Rights,centric approach to human rights. Some supranational initiatives are critiqued for being ‘fragile’ and for positioning ‘us’ and ‘them’ in relation to human rights. Counterhegemonic ways that go counter to such approaches are discussed in the field of education to conclude the chapter.

Thymus

convert

ALIAS

cloture

后退

Misnomers,y, a central concept of our times, is very important for interculturality. The author argues that it needs to be examined from a co-constructivist position. Finally, the concept of collectivity is redefined in relation to postmodern interculturality.