Titlebook: Informed Consent; Patient Autonomy and Stephen Wear Book 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993 Beauchamp.Ethos.autonomy.benef

adroit

意外

剛毅

Toward a Model of Informed Consent-Theoretical and Programmatic Considerationsand values of informed consent seems to recede just as these goods and values become clearer. The third chapter surely affords us no grounds for optimism. Even on a “bits and pieces” model of informed consent, many patients perform only marginally. If we move to the “essay mode” of understanding, we

委屈

The Informed Consent Eventnt in our account, however much it may need to be augmented by a surrounding process. The informed consent event has three distinct stages, each aimed at quite different, though complementary goals: (1) the . stage, which will roughly approximate the detailed presentation of risks, benefits and alte

Hemiparesis

Exceptions to Informed Consentfrom the patient. The exception based on the incompetence of the patient has already been discussed in the previous chapter. Aside from patient incompetence, there are three other legally sanctioned types of exceptions: (1) in an “emergency”, when there is insufficient time to pursue an informed con

Keshan-disease

完成

Toward a Model of Informed Consent-Theoretical and Programmatic Considerations may well wonder how often this ideal is even remotely approached by most patients. If we then include our reflections on diminished competence, the barriers to informed consent, and the complexities that medical decisions often present, the whole enterprise comes to look quite ill-starred.

dysphagia

The New Ethos of Patient Autonomyore congruent with the general practices and aspirations of a free society. And it is to this social movement, this “new ethos of patient autonomy” (McCullough and Wear, 1985; Wear, 1991), that we must now refer in order to understand the agendas, insights and arguments behind the doctrine of informed consent.

vitrectomy

Gesture

Book 1993patient‘ with informed patientparticipation in medical decision-making. This ‘new ethos of patientautonomy‘ has especially insisted on the routine provision of informedconsent for all medical interventions. Stronly supported by mostbioethicists and the law, as well as more popular writings andexpect