Titlebook: Image Ethics in Shakespeare and Spenser; James A. Knapp Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2011 dialogue.Earl

破裂

哭得清醒了

,“Ocular Proof” and the Dangers of the Perceptual Faith,e statements, Merleau-Ponty asserts that “if we ask ourselves what is this ., what . is, and what . or . is, we enter into a labyrinth of difficulties and contradictions.”. Rather than confront these difficult questions, the natural temptation is to retreat into the safety of what Merleau-Ponty term

發(fā)酵劑

Deceit

Introduction: Image Ethics, may the outward shows be least themselves / the world is still deceived with ornament’ (3.2.79-80). By following Bassanio’s speech on the proper attitude toward ‘outward shows’ with a scene in which the hero is called upon to respond to a particular visual image thrust before his eyes, Shakespeare

禁止

貨物

厚顏無恥

,Looking for Ethics in Spenser’s ,, Spenser’s poetic method. His reliance on visualization—what Frye takes for poor powers of conceptualization—reflects his debt to Aristotle’s theory of cognition in ., especially the assertion: ‘it is necessary that, whenever one is contemplating, it is some image that one is contemplating.’. In the

CIS

photophobia

瑣碎