Titlebook: Household and Family Economics; Paul L. Menchik Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996 development.earnings.economics.edu

明顯

書目名稱Household and Family Economics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Household and Family Economics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Household and Family Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Household and Family Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Household and Family Economics被引頻次




書目名稱Household and Family Economics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Household and Family Economics年度引用




書目名稱Household and Family Economics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Household and Family Economics讀者反饋




書目名稱Household and Family Economics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

intricacy

,The Roles of the Family in the Formation of Offsprings’ Earnings and Income Capacity,y. The family generally influences a child’s income capacity by contributing genes, changing his or her marginal productivity via “investments” in human capital, and/or changing his level of financial assets. We will examine both the determinants of individuals’ level of human capital and the distri

山頂可休息

,Discussion of “The Roles of the Family in the Formation of Offspring’s Earnings and Income Capacityamount of theoretical and empirical work on the nature and sources of parents’ contributions to their children’s economic welfare. I wish only to extend his discussion of two particular overlapping issues: (1) the extent of intergenerational income mobility and (2) the connection between current and

表示問

Explaining Intergenerational Transfers,d when Kotlikoff and Summers (1981) reported their estimate that 80% of the household wealth of the United States is due to inheritance rather than life-cycle saving. Despite counterclaims (e.g., by Modigliani, 1988), it is now generally acknowledged that a large fraction of saving is not destined f

苦笑

,Comment on James Davies’, “Explaining Intergenerational Transfers”, He reviews the main “stylized facts” and proceeds to see how they square with predictions of alternate models of transfer behavior-altruism versus exchange. Further, he advances some intriguing new approaches to the enforcement of intergenerational, exchange-related contracts, drawing on some recen

遺產(chǎn)

A Review of Recent Developments in the Economics of Fertility,around 1.8 for the better part of the 1970s and 1980s. The economy rose and fell, taking with it wages and employment rates; the baby boom gradually assumed its place in the labor force as the focus shifted to the baby bust generation; and female labor force participation rates continued to climb —

Sigmoidoscopy

Fertility and Fertility Research: Where are They Going? A Comment on the Macunovich Paper,ate will continue to do so well into the next century. A non-economist might suppose, therefore, that the causes of the baby boom and the prospects for a new one might be high on the economics research agenda. But economics has never been unduly influenced by concerns with empirical relevance, and f

悠然

Family Labor Market Incentives: Men and Women Working for Pay,ket oriented fields. Over the life cycle, women’s wages rise less quickly, but are fairly comparable at least initially when both men and women start working. Being married is associated with lower wages for women, but higher wages for men, yet single men and women fare almost equally. Children exac

哺乳動(dòng)物

sacrum

Income Tax Treatment of the Family,ttention. Differentiation between different types of families for purposes of the income tax has been accomplished via personal exemptions and differential rate structures for different types of families. But even these changes have not been consistent.