Titlebook: Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830; Visions of History Ben Dew (Senior Lecturer),Fiona Price (Reader in E Book 2014 Palgrave Macmilla

raff淫雨霏霏

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Historical Writing in Britain, 1688-1830讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Provenance

審問(wèn),審訊

Introduction: Visions of History, with such narratives of mass progress. ‘The study of the individual’ not only enables the ‘solemn act of se If-investigation’ and furthers the study of ‘mind’, ‘élucidat [ing]’ ‘science’. it also allows the ‘contemplation of illustrious men’ under the strain of historical circumstance and is, as such, inspirational.

農(nóng)學(xué)

不規(guī)則的跳動(dòng)

倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn)

Fictions of History, Evangelical Whiggism and the Debate over , in Scotland and Nova Scotia,th all the rapidity of one who has the pen of a ready writer […] Praise his Scotch, which is exceeding good, but reprobate his principles with all your might […] I long to see the Covenanters rescued from his paws.’

小卷發(fā)

Ben Dew (Senior Lecturer),Fiona Price (Reader in E

死亡

Caroline Goodhysician with practical and theoretical knowledge of the subject, and deep sympathy for the parental and family perspectives. As such, the book proposes a new way of evaluating parental and state interventions 978-3-030-87700-2978-3-030-87698-2Series ISSN 2662-9186 Series E-ISSN 2662-9194

Mechanics

流眼淚

Ben Dew,Fiona Priceclassifies parental behavior into four categories, based on the maximum appropriate state response. Parental behavior within the Zone of Acceptability warrants no government attention. The next two zones represent divisions of Gillam’s Zone of Parental Discretion. Parental action within the Zone of