Titlebook: Henry More (1614–1687) Tercentenary Studies; with a biography and Sarah Hutton Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Anne Conway.Gottfr

縮短

Robert Crockerle . und . zu . und ., wodurch ein Parallelogramm . entsteht. Wir fragen nun : auf welcher Kurve mu? sich der Punkt . in diesem Winkelraume oder in dem seines Schei-telwinkels bewegen, damit er mit den beiden Geraden . und . und den dazu Parallelen, die durch ihn gezogen werden, . ? Die zu bestimmen

里程碑

Sarah Huttonn sie die . oder .-Achse, die andere hei?e . oder Y-Achse ; beide Achsen zusammen werden die . genannt. Sie schneiden sich im . oder Koordinatenanfangspunkt oder Ursprung .. Auf jeder Achse unterscheiden wir zwei .; die positive Richtung in der .-Achse geht von links nach rechts, in der Y-Achse von

亞麻制品

主講人

Henry More: A Biographical Essay,amily.. Brought up in a large Calvinist gentry household, More was sent as a child to the local grammar school in Grantham. After revealing something of his intellectual abilities there, at fourteen his education was taken in hand by a learned uncle, Gabriel More, sometime Fellow of Christ’s College

不再流行

debacle

推遲

Henry More versus Robert Boyle: The Spirit of Nature and the Nature of Providence,our significant attacks on his interpretation of various hydrostatical experiments he felt it necessary to respond publicly to three of them. These attacks came from the pens of Thomas Hobbes, Franciscus Linus and Henry More.. It is fairly easy to see why Boyle should be so disturbed by the writings

Congruous

,Leibniz and More’s Cabbalistic Circle,ho were members of what I am referring to as More’s ‘circle’ — a group of people with a common enthusiasm for the Cabbala and a particular interest in the project for translating the . into Latin that reached its fruition when the . was published in 1677 and 1684. These friends were Francis Mercury

antedate

The Spiritualistic Cosmologies of Henry More and Anne Conway,ation that itself is pretty vague. More, on the one hand, has been seen to have one of the most incisive critics of Descartes, Hobbes and Spinoza. He was also one of the sharpest opponents of various kinds of religious enthusiasm and unlike most of his religious contemporaries, found nothing of inte