Titlebook: Heidegger, Levinas, Derrida: The Question of Difference; Lisa Foran,Rozemund Uljée Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

–scent

circuit

Between the Singular and the Proper: On Deconstructive Personhood,ity of substance with itself’, Heidegger’s notion of the transcendent finitude of being ‘held out into the nothing’ as a precondition of personhood, and Levinas’s avowedly personalist notion of the singular other that transcends and ‘undoes’ its phenomenal presentation.

一回合

Substitution and ,(,),: An Existential Interpretation of the Responsibility for the Other,evinas thinks the ethical relationship in ., as “substitution,” as “responsibility for the responsibility of the other,” and it shows that one’s responsibility for the other’s responsibility can also be interpreted existentially, as authentic ., as care for the other’s care. The “substitution of one

Genteel

The Future of Deconstruction: Beyond the Impossible,reflection under the tutelage of a philosophical heritage, in this case that of Diderot’s and Seneca’s; but also pointing towards the unsettling, ambiguous and equivocal, nature of this tradition. The unsettling nature of this tradition means, as always for Derrida, the aporetic movement which inces

礦石

The Gift and the Skin: Derrida and Levinas on Language, Metaphor and Subjectivity,ism of metaphor as a means of metaphysical thinking, both relate language to an otherness that exceeds any ontological clarification. However, both reintroduce basic metaphors in order to be able to address the question of subjectivity: the skin in Levinas’ analysis of substitution in Otherwise than

河流

出來

The Untranslatable to Come: From Saying to Unsayable,the manner in which these two ‘sayings’ converge and diverge around the place of language. Broadly speaking, I argue that in their treatment of this word Heidegger and Levinas remain within the tradition of metaphysics insofar as the term ‘saying’ names. It names precisely a difference within the sp

使堅(jiān)硬

惡心

種植,培養(yǎng)

,Echoes…Before the Other,t of Western thought in a manner analogous to Kantianism, which separated dogmatic from critical philosophy?” A line of demarcation running through Western thought could also be written as Western thought. In this essay I will ask what might such a form of demarcation mean for reading Derrida in rel