Titlebook: Hegel and the History of Philosophy; Proceedings of the 1 Joseph J. O’Malley,K. W. Algozin,Frederick G. Weis Conference proceedings 1974 Ma

確定的事

Hegelianism and Platonism,derived from his reading of the ., the ., the ., the . and the . and other dialogues that he closely studied, as rather the essential affinity of his thought with Plato’s, the degree to which Platonism and Hegelianism are, in my view, the same philosophy, with differences of emphasis and elaboration

fetter

,On Hegel’s Platonism,ontinuously, fluidity of interpretation seldom characterizes the Anglo-American scholarship. In England Hegel has been made known and rejected through the great systems of Bradley and Bosanquet. That Hegel was a transcendent metaphysician, a subjectivist in epistemology, and a manic rationalist is a

合法

鍵琴

柳樹；枯黃

anesthesia

Kant and Hegel on Practical Reason,ulated in the first .. These limits are the epistemic consequences following from the application of the model of mechanistic materialism to the objects of human experience. Under this paradigmatically but ahistorically restricted conception of experience, nature appears as a uniform causal chain of

Infinitesimal

Moral Autonomy in Kant and Hegel,omprises three volumes, totally nearly 1700 pages, and Hegel himself stated once that the Kantian philosophy is the foundation and starting point of modern German philosophy. The general influence of the Kantian works and in particular the influence of Kant’s ethics on Hegel’s . is well known, and H

atopic

口味

改進(jìn)