找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Has Liberalism Failed Women?; Assuring Equal Repre Jytte Klausen,Charles S. Maier Book 2001 Jytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier 2001 constit

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 38717|回復(fù): 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:38:06 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?
副標題Assuring Equal Repre
編輯Jytte Klausen,Charles S. Maier
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/425/424419/424419.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Has Liberalism Failed Women?; Assuring Equal Repre Jytte Klausen,Charles S. Maier Book 2001 Jytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier 2001 constit
描述This book comes out of a conference in April of 1999 at the Center for European Studies at Harvard University on the topic of ‘Gender Parity and the Liberal Tradition: Proposals and Debates in Europe and the United States.‘ It is a collection of short essays that attempt to capture the theoretical arguments and policy changes presented at the conference. The essays are divided into three sections, each of which approaches from a different angle the central question of whether liberalism has failed women. The first section aims to frame the discussion by outlining the theoretical arguments for the amendments or revisions implied by the proponents of the Parity Movement in Europe and for the concerns raised by critics. The second describes recent changes in party rules, European legal framework, and national constitutions, as well as the gains made by women in response to rule change. The third section provides American perspectives on the lessons that parity advocates might draw from affirmative action policies and speculations about how parity rules would work in the American context. The essays are drawn from top European and American scholars.
出版日期Book 2001
關(guān)鍵詞constitution; gender; Policy; women; work
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107502
isbn_softcover978-1-349-42641-6
isbn_ebook978-0-230-10750-2
copyrightJytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier 2001
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?被引頻次




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?年度引用




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?讀者反饋




書目名稱Has Liberalism Failed Women?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:53:49 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:31:55 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:29:45 | 只看該作者
Book 2001third section provides American perspectives on the lessons that parity advocates might draw from affirmative action policies and speculations about how parity rules would work in the American context. The essays are drawn from top European and American scholars.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:25:44 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:56:52 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:17:05 | 只看該作者
uropean Union policies). This difficulty has prompted an image of ‘delay’ in Mediterranean countries, either in adopting productivist pathways (e.g. increasing the size of agricultural holdings) or in developing an internal market for organic products or urban food policies.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:43:01 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:51:37 | 只看該作者
Agnès Hubertncluded that the built-up expansions were predominantly on agricultural lands where 15.6?ha/year of agricultural lands were eliminated. These abrupt rates of losing agricultural lands are alarming and require adopting appropriate strategies for sustainable land use in this area.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:50:20 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 15:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
滕州市| 西平县| 江陵县| 南昌县| 沙坪坝区| 讷河市| 河东区| 余江县| 辽宁省| 景德镇市| 安福县| 舟山市| 博湖县| 夏河县| 正安县| 洞头县| 宜宾县| 宁南县| 孝义市| 衡南县| 松桃| 南靖县| 西畴县| 博爱县| 北辰区| 大余县| 江孜县| 芜湖市| 珠海市| 交口县| 肇州县| 洪江市| 通渭县| 富川| 鄂温| 佛冈县| 四川省| 延安市| 临漳县| 东丰县| 霞浦县|