Titlebook: Globalization and the Welfare State; Bo S?dersten Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004 globalizat

Blazon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5574-2n either virtuous or vicious spirals. Moreover, welfare-state dynamics may involve induced (endogenous) changes in social norms and political preferences, which also tend to occur only after considerable time lags. After a discussion of these topics, I make some final comments on the dynamics of reforms and retreats of welfare-state arrangements.

出來

Kooperative Prozesse von Weiterbildung,e undesirable effects, these are seen as being less serious than the consequences of disinvestment and capital flight. Governments therefore comply, albeit often reluctantly. Welfare states become increasingly similar because mobile capital punishes those who deviate in the direction of generosity.

橫截,橫斷

不要嚴酷

,What to Make of the Dutch and Danish ‘Miracles’?,d, for a number of reasons, these welfare states have come under pressure since the 1980s. Poor economic performance, changing family patterns, ageing populations and globalization are among the factors argued to force welfare states to reforms.

CHARM

創(chuàng)造性

有花

2662-2483 process is examined as is the importance of changing and evolving social norms regarding work and leisure for the survival of today‘s welfare states.978-1-4039-3257-0978-0-230-52442-2Series ISSN 2662-2483 Series E-ISSN 2662-2491

Nonflammable

The Aftermath of Welfare Reform in the USA,s. It cannot be said that either the Administration or the Congress is basing its decisions on any serious analysis of the working of the 1996 Act, and that is an interesting fact by itself. This brief note cannot fill that gap, but it will make some selected inferences, and at least point to the relevant academic literature.

committed

禁止,切斷

Multinational Enterprises and Their Effect on Labour Markets,r than the growth in world trade in goods and services. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, the yearly rate of growth in total FDI flows was around 20–25 per cent, and during the late 1990s it was as high as around 40 per cent (UNCTAD, 2001)..