Titlebook: Geography Meets Gendlin; An Exploration of Di Janet Banfield Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Eugene Gendlin.

BULB

書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin被引頻次




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin年度引用




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin讀者反饋




書目名稱Geography Meets Gendlin讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

舔食

Janet BanfieldPresents a uniquely detailed and sustained geographical engagement with the work of Eugene Gendlin.Argues for the potential of Gendlin’s philosophy and methodology to reinvigorate non-representational

Binge-Drinking

Vertical

Rechts- und Anspruchsgrundlagen,graphy, highlighting consistencies and discrepancies concerning the relation between the reflective (representational) and the pre-reflective (non-representational), and the specific relation between affect, emotion and cognition. Banfield highlights some of the key challenges currently faced by non

decode

Beitr?ge zur Politik und Zeitgeschichteh in the use of video- and practice-based methods—in which researchers actively participate in the practice that they are researching—and psychologically informed methods—which use psychotherapeutic techniques for non-clinical purposes. Banfield proposes that these developments reflect an increasing

Arrhythmia

Arrhythmia

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-33080-7perience. Emphasizing Eugene Gendlin’s insistence on our capacity to access and articulate from our pre-reflective experience, which runs counter to conventional non-representational geographical understandings, Banfield explores Gendlin’s ideas of explication—the development of reflective (conceptu

傻瓜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-33078-4eing of new representational forms, Banfield develops recent geographical efforts to rethink abstraction as productive rather than reductive through Gendlin’s work. Considering progression as pre-reflective connectivity between established concepts, she addresses the potential to think more-than-log

AVOW

Der Park als Festoper im Freien,raphical research into artistic practices. Making a valuable contribution to the development of research methods to apprehend affect, Banfield highlights the potential for both linguistic improvisation and formal conceptual understanding to afford access to pre-reflective understanding. She discusse

俗艷