Titlebook: Gender Politics in US College Athletic Departments; The Case of the Univ Lisa A. Kihl,Vicki D. Schull,Sally Shaw Book 2016 The Editor(s) (i

事先無(wú)準(zhǔn)備

BAIL

Berthold Haller,Wilfried Probstding the strengths and limitations of merging the two departments are presented and analyzed. In these discussions, we highlight the politicking of organizational stakeholders who either supported or opposed the merger.

重畫只能放棄

Chemisch-pharmaceutischer Unterrichtof trust and loyalties, department restructuring, and cultural re-engineering. The challenges the athletic director experienced in the context of the merger are discussed in relation to the literature.

Isolate

偶像

漂亮

The Rubber Hits the Road!,of trust and loyalties, department restructuring, and cultural re-engineering. The challenges the athletic director experienced in the context of the merger are discussed in relation to the literature.

Loathe

使痛苦

integrated

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53705-9We assess stakeholders’ reflections ten years post-merger including the challenges that they feared and which fears actually occurred. Stakeholders’ reflections about the current merged department and what it represents were analyzed. Last, we report on the department’s current gender-political status.

嚴(yán)厲譴責(zé)

Ms. and M,In this chapter, we describe the case of the Minnesota athletic department merger. We present the pre-merger conditions—specifically, the two athletic department cultures and their gendered characteristics. We also describe relationships between key actors and key organizational structures and processes.