Titlebook: Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe; Lise Rolandsen Agustín Book 2013 Lise Rolandsen Agust?n 2013 desegregation.EU

ROOF

The Place of Brazil in the Black Atlantic,bining ethnicity and gender identities and claims as well as their interrelations with majority organizations. Thus, the chapter assesses the potential of the transnational, European civil society panorama in terms of defining and representing the diversity of women’s collective interest vis-à-vis t

協(xié)迫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43332-1plications of degendering within the particular institutional setup and institutional context of the EU. Civil society actions, reactions, and interaction with the EU institutions are addressed across the three chapters.

Cocker

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49935-8 the EC tried to persuade the Council to use a general legal base that would legitimize EU level action. The Council did not accept this and recurred to the legal base of public health protection instead. Given the impossibility of advancing in a different direction, the EP used the framework of pub

instill

Gender Equality, Intersectionality, and Diversity in Europe

DENT

迫擊炮

Policy making, Institutionalization, and Collective Mobilization: A Model for Transnational Interseirical study of EU policy making. According to Kantola,. the agents articulating discourses “act not only within a discursive context but also within an institutional context, which constitute them as both subjects and actors” (2006, 45). There is an interrelation between the discursive and the inst

2否定

采納

,Minority Intersectional Constituencies and Women’s Collective Mobilization at the European Level, comes to gender equality and the definition of “women’s interests.” I argue that transnational mobilization holds constraints in itself—of economic and political nature—though the possibility of organizing at this level is both enabled and hindered by the EU and its institutional and financial fram

Esalate

graphy

Transnational Policy Framings: (De)Gendering in the Context of Institutionalization,t of structural gender inequality, women’s rights as human rights, or public health. On the one hand, these differences can be attributed to the institutional authorship of the texts, as the EP documents articulate frames related to gender equality and human rights whereas the EC focuses on public h